Category Archives: Family

17 November 2016 10:30 ~ Open Meeting – Mothers at Home Matter – London

11 Mandeville Place, London, W1U 3AJ
located just off Oxford Street, close to Bond Street tube station

Agenda

  • 10.30am – Tea & coffee, followed by the Chair’s welcome
  • 11.00am – Open Meeting. Speakers Vanessa Olorenshaw and Joanna Roughton
  • 1.00pm – LUNCH
  • 2-4pm – AGM

Vanessa is a mother of two, feminist, activist and breastfeeding counsellor who left the law for a life. She was raised in a working class family in Kent, England. Her 2015 pamphlet The Politics of Mothering criticised mainstream UK political parties for undemocratic and consensus policies on childcare and mothers at home. She was a founding member-cum-agitator of the UK Women’s Equality Party and contributor to policy development on parenting. Vanessa believes that there is a need for a revolutionary, progressive, approach to the ‘mother question’ – and wrote Liberating Motherhood to encourage a mother movement to challenge destructive patriarchal and neoliberal policies. She will be speaking at the Open Meeting about what led her write the book and the pamphlet.

We’re delighted that Joanna Roughton has agreed to speak at our Open Meeting in London this year. Jo was formerly Television News Editor for Reuters based in Hong Kong and Singapore, and latterly the Head of Foreign News at Sky News in London. In 2002 she took the decision to become a full-time homemaker to her six children. Through the weekly ‘BeHome’ blog, Jo highlights important issues around ‘Home’ matters, writing about current events that affect the home and people who run it. The ‘BeHome’ blog is a project of the Home Renaissance Foundation (HRF) which aims to highlight the importance of the work of the home as an essential building block of society, leading to a better and healthier society. HRF believes the home is like a business; the better organised it is, the happier everyone will be. But if it’s neglected it will fail to provide the comfort and security that everyone needs. The work of the home needs to be taken seriously and to be properly recognised. Joanna’s blog is for anyone who feels the work of the home is undervalued and should be properly celebrated.

  • Tickets – £15.00 (including lunch & refreshments)
  • All are welcome – do come and bring a friend
  • Babies and children welcome, but no creche provided
  • Cost a problem? A reduced rate is available – please ask!

—————————————————————————————————————

    MAHM Membership Number (if applicable)

    To book your place, please complete this slip and send, together with a cheque (made payable to Mothers at Home Matter): Lynne Burnham , 31 Earlswood Road, Redhill, Surrey RH1 6HD, 01737 768705. Alternatively, if you wish to pay by bank transfer, please email info@mothersathomematter.co.uk for further details.

    Name

    Number of tickets required

    Address

    Postcode

    Tickets can be sent to you by email from the Secretary – contact lynne.burnham@googlemail.com

    www.mothersathomematter.co.uk

—————————————————————————————————————

November 10, 2016

Disposable Women: Abuse, Violence and Abandonment in Transnational Marriages

Issues for Policy and Practice in the UK and India

Abandonment of wives by non – resident Indian men in transnational marriages has become a widespread phenomenon. Abandonment can take three forms: (a) a woman , migrating after marriage to her Indian – origin husband’s country of residence , may be ousted or (less commonly) flee after a period of abuse ; (b) a woman who has migrated with her husband after marriage may be deceived into returning to India for a vacation and abandoned there, while her husband returns and revoke s her visa ; (c) a woman may be left behind in India after marriage while her husband goes back with assurances that he will sponsor her visa, but the woman is left with her in – laws and is eventually ousted from their home or leaves because of domestic violence.

This study was conducted between December 2013 and May 2015 with abandoned wives in the second and third categories in Delhi, Punjab and Gujarat, states in India which have a long history of out – migration to the UK and other countries in the West. This study explores the nature and patterns of abuse and abandonment in transnational marriages, and document s women’s experience of the legal and judicial apparatus in the UK and India in their quest for justice. I t is hoped that the findings will stimulate policy debates within and between the two countries on abandonment as a form of gender – specific violence and on measures to address the problem.

Twenty – eight of the 57 women interviewed for this research had been married to men resident in the UK, eight of the husbands were from Italy, four each from Australia and USA, with smaller numbers from other countries. About two – fifth of the women we interviewed had migrated following their marriage while the remaining women remained in India with their in – laws, while they awaited a spousal visa. Most of t he women reported that their marriages had been hastily arranged with the exchange of dowry and lavish celebrations, all paid for by the bride’s family.

The majority of the women reported that they had experience d physical violence perpetrated by their husband, in – laws or both. All the women were subjected to coercive control, isolation and financial abuse. The women who were left behind with their in – laws were mo re likely to experience violence from female in – laws, while a majority of the violence experienced by marriage migrants was perpetrated by their husbands.

A third of the research participants disclosed sexual abuse perpetrated by their husband, while just under a quarter disclosed sexual abuse by male in – laws. A fifth of the research participants had been coerced in to undergoing abortion(s). A majority of the women who experienced sexual abuse indicated that our interview was the first time they had disclosed this abuse.

All the women interviewed had sole responsibility for domestic labour in the household while a minority of women who engaged in paid work experienced appropriation of their wages. A majority of women also suffered abuse and control in the context of micro – management of their domestic labour and about half of the women were denied food and adequate lodgings, and subjected to degrading treatment.

Ongoing demands for dowry, and escalating violence where such demands could not be met, were significant contexts for abuse for the majority of the women. Inability to meet dowry demands eventually triggered abandonment f or most of the women left with their in – laws.

Socio-cultural norms against divorce compelled women to remain in abusive relationships. Insecure immigration status prevented marriage migrants from seeking help. A majority of the women who had migrated following marriage were deceptively taken back to India and abandoned there. A small number of marriage migrants eventually fled their husband’s country of residence because of the escalating violence. Women left with in – laws were eventually cast out of the affine home, while a small minority left because of the violence.

Following abandonment, ex-parte divorce proceedings were initiated by the husband, in a context where the woman was ignorant of the proceedings or could not represent herself in legal 4 proceedings in another country. Some of the women did initiate legal action in India against their husbands and in – laws, however most complaints ended in a compromise agreement or were not pursued by the police. Very few of the women received financial settlement of any kind upon divorce, and none received any maintenance for their children or return of their dowry.

The findings suggest that cultural practices like dowry, son preference, and dominant social norms which make for patriarchal control and devaluation of women played an important role in the violence and abandonment that ensued in all marriages. Crucially, the inadequacy of national and transnational legal mechanisms served to create transnational brides as a particularly vulnerable category of women who could be abused and exploited with impunity. I t was in this context that some Indian – origin men in the diaspora sought brides in India and treated them as disposable women, whose abuse was not a matter of concern

Download the full report from https://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/20091/7/20091%20Anitha%20et%20al_2016_Disposable%20women.pdf

October 3, 2016

16 July 2016 11:00 ~ Keeping our Girls Safe: Family Day – Forward – London

Free

Until 15.00 @ Montague Public Hall, Montague Road, Hounslow, Middlesex TW3 1LD

FORWARD and Hounslow Community Safety Partnership invite you to Hounslow Against Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) Event: Keeping Our Girls Safe Family Day!

The family day will include free lunch, film screening, henna, face painting and more!

All are welcome!

Please visit our website (www.forwarduk.org.uk/events) to book your place or RSVP to forwardevents@forwarduk.org.uk

See more at http://forwarduk.org.uk/civicrm/?page=CiviCRM&q=civicrm/event/info&reset=1&id=17

July 15, 2016

Motherhood Penalty for Women and Daddy Bonus for Men – Fawcett

Today (8 March 2016) Fawcett release the latest findings from our nationwide poll of 8,000 people, entitled ‘Parents, work and care: Striking the Balance’. The poll  found that when a woman has a baby, 46% of people believe she becomes less committed to her job, compared to just 11% believing a man becomes less committed.  In stark contrast 29% of people believe dads become more committed compared to just 8% for a woman.

The survey, carried out by Survation, also finds that many dads want to care but are struggling, with 75% of men taking 2 weeks or less at the birth of their child and a third (33%) of dads take only 1-5 days. 4 in 10 fathers (41%) say they did not get enough leave.

But the poll also shows that the desire for flexible working is now universal. Over two thirds (68%) of people say that when they think about their career choices they think about whether a job is likely to allow them to balance work and family. This rises to 72% for dads and 79% for mums.

CEO Sam Smethers said:

‘The motherhood penalty and daddy bonus are still a strong feature of our workplaces. It’s clear that when a woman has a baby she is overwhelmingly perceived as becoming less committed to her job, while a dad is much more likely to be seen as more committed.  This drives inequality and forces women and men into traditional male breadwinner, female carer roles.’

Key findings:

  • For 9 out of 10 tasks we asked about men said they are mostly the responsibility of their child’s other parent.
  • Men are most likely to say that they are mostly responsible for making sure children do their homework. 28% of men say this mostly their responsibility and 21% said it is mostly the responsibility of their child’s other parent. Women disagree. 60% said making sure children do their homework is mostly their responsibility.
  • Men are least likely to say that organising playdates and children’s parties is their responsibility with only 18% saying this while 7% of women said it iss the responsibility of their child’s other partner
  • Women are most likely to say that washing the children’s clothes is mostly their responsibility. 79% of women say this, more than ten times as many as those who say it is mostly their child’s other parent (7%). Only 13% of women say it is shared equally.
  • Across all tasks on average 37% of men said that they were equally shared while just 20% of women said the same.

Read the full press release here.

Read the full report here.

http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/2016/03/motherhood-penalty-for-women-and-daddy-bonus-for-men/?mc_cid=c91e5db89e&mc_eid=4c07ddff42

March 8, 2016

Child First: Safe Child Contact Saves Lives – Women’s Aid

What are we calling for?

We are calling on the Government, all family courts professionals, and involved agencies to make the family court process safer for women and children survivors of domestic abuse.

Join our the Child First campaign today and help us to ensure that children are always put at the heart of contact decisions made by the family courts.

Sign the petition below and use #ChildFirst to help us spread the word. Together we can put an end to unsafe child contact.

Why now?

We have launched the Child First campaign to stop avoidable child deaths as a result of unsafe child contact with dangerous perpetrators of domestic violence.

Survivors of domestic abuse frequently tell us that they can be re-victimised and traumatised by their abusers, even after separation, through the family court process.

“The family court was an arena for him to continue his abuse on a much more damaging scale. I wasn’t heard or listened too. My children have suffered drastically as a result.” – Survivor

Our campaign report, Nineteen Child Homicides, highlights the tragic stories of 19 children and 2 women in 12 families that were killed by perpetrators of domestic abuse in circumstances related to unsafe child contact within a ten year period. It’s possible that these deaths could have been prevented if the domestic abuse had been considered as an ongoing risk factor.

Further information & support

Whilst the cases featured in Nineteen Child Homicides are truly shocking, it is important to note that these extreme cases are very rare, and that there is advice and support out there for anyone wishing to leave an abusive relationship or anyone who has concerns around child contact.

If you have any concerns about your safety, or that of anyone you know, please contact the police on 999 in an emergency or call the National Domestic Violence Helpline (run in partnership with Refuge): 0808 2000 247

Sign our petition https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/child-first-safe-child-contact-saves-lives

Download the report https://1q7dqy2unor827bqjls0c4rn-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Child-First-Nineteen-Child-Homicides-Report.pdf

Check for other links at https://www.womensaid.org.uk/childfirst/

See press release at https://www.womensaid.org.uk/launch-of-nineteen-child-homicides-report-child-first-campaign/

January 21, 2016