- Snap study by IWF found almost 900 instances of penetration, bestiality or sadism content in just five days.
- More than half of the child sexual abuse material identified was hosted in EU.
- MEP calls for a ‘harmonised EU approach’ for tackling this horrible crime.
Analysts at the Internet Watch Foundation found nearly 900 instances of the most severe form of abuse material – known as Category A in UK law and involving sexual penetration, acts of bestiality or sadism – over a five-day period.
All the criminal content analysed in the study had been shared online by an abuser, or abusers, coercing a child via an internet-connected device with a camera. The abuser was remote to the child.
In keeping with a broader trend, more than half of the content (57%) was hosted in EU countries, of which the Netherlands and the Slovak Republic feature in the top three.
The IWF is Europe’s largest hotline dedicated to finding and removing images and videos of child sexual abuse from the internet. It is the only European hotline with the legal powers to proactively search for this kind of content.
Creation of this type of sexual abuse content is orchestrated by criminals watching online via webcams, smartphones or other devices. Child victims are groomed and coerced into performing the sexual activities in their own homes and the images and videos are then shared and distributed many times over by offenders profiting from the victim’s trauma and abuse. No blame should be placed on the child.
Efforts to curb the amount of child sexual abuse material hosted in Europe are thwarted by criminals who relocate the material from servers in one host country to those in another to evade detection and blocking.
Children aged 11- to 13-years-old accounted for most of the images recorded (75%); while 20% was of 7- to 10-year-olds; and 5% were of children aged 14- to 15-years-old.
This type of child sexual abuse, where a child is groomed and coerced over the internet, is by far the fastest growing type of sexual abuse material seen by the IWF. Almost three quarters (72%) of the webpages actioned last year contained this sort of imagery – an increase on 2020 when 44% of actioned reports were abuse imagery created via the internet.
The snap study by the IWF was sparked by analysts viewing a “self-generated” video earlier this year of a young girl who had been coerced into penetrating herself with her finger before being instructed to rub her genitals with the handle of a sharp kitchen knife.
Among the Category A images and videos identified, 889 contained girls, six contained both boys and girls and one contained boys only.
A note about terminology used in this press release:
In her final report in the UK Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), Professor Alexis Jay OBE, the inquiry’s chair, calls for plain and clear language to be used when talking about child sexual abuse. She said in her opening statement to the final report:
“We also need to use the correct words to describe the actions of abusers – masturbation, anal and oral rape, penetration by objects – these words are still not considered acceptable terms by many in public and private discourse. Every incident of abuse is a crime and should not be minimised or dismissed as anything less, or downplayed because descriptions of the abuse might cause offence.”
She is right. And it is thanks to her remarks that IWF has decided to make this data publicly available, and to describe what we’re seeing as accurately as we can.
If we cannot be brave enough to use the right words to describe the true horror of what children are coerced to do, how can we expect children to be brave enough to find a way to talk to trusted adults about what is happening to them online.
A brief extract from a longer press release at https://www.iwf.org.uk/news-media/news/vital-eu-regulation-needed-to-prevent-the-coercion-of-children-online-into-most-severe-form-of-sexual-abuse-as-highlighted-by-new-iwf-study/
November 25, 2022