BME women are particularly likely to be on zero-hours contracts – New TUC Report with ROTA

Summary

Insecure work is bad for the workers involved and bad for the economy.

Zero-hours contracts are the most egregious example of one-sided flexibility at work where the employer has absolute power over whether and when to offer shifts.

This joint report by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and Race on the Agenda (ROTA) shows that disproportionate numbers of Black and minority ethnic (BME) workers are on zero-hours contracts. BME women are particularly likely to be on zero-hours contracts.

It also punctures the myth that zero-hours workers like the arrangement. In fact, most BME workers on variable-hours contracts would prefer to work fixed hours.

We need swift action from the government to ban the use of such contracts. It should give workers the right to contracts reflecting their normal hours of work and implement long-awaited plans to introduce ethnic minority pay gap reporting.

Introduction

A zero-hours contract is one in which an employer is not obliged to provide a minimum number of hours.

New analysis contained in this report reveals that:

  • nearly 160,000 BME workers are on zero-hours contracts, around one in six of the 1 million people who are on them, even though BME workers make up just one in nine employees
  • one in 20 (4.5 per cent) women workers from a BME background are on such contracts, compared to just 2.5 per cent of white men
  • more than half of BME workers on a variable-hours contract would like a fixed-hours contract. Just 27 per cent would prefer their existing arrangement.

Zero-hours contracts are the most egregious form of one-sided flexibility.

Those with no guaranteed hours are often offered work at the whim of their employer, can face irregular shifts and therefore irregular income. Rather than pick and choose their hours, many workers feel compelled to work whenever asked. If shifts are turned down, there’s an implicit threat that they could lose future work.

We urgently need a package to deliver decent jobs for BME workers including:

  • a ban on zero-hours contracts
  • the introduction of ethnic minority pay gap reporting
  • new corporate reporting obligations on firms’ employment models.

Part of a longer press release at https://www.tuc.org.uk/research-analysis/reports/bme-workers-zero-hours-contracts

June 21, 2021

BME women are particularly likely to be on zero-hours contracts – New TUC Report with ROTA

Summary

Insecure work is bad for the workers involved and bad for the economy.

Zero-hours contracts are the most egregious example of one-sided flexibility at work where the employer has absolute power over whether and when to offer shifts.

This joint report by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and Race on the Agenda (ROTA) shows that disproportionate numbers of Black and minority ethnic (BME) workers are on zero-hours contracts. BME women are particularly likely to be on zero-hours contracts.

It also punctures the myth that zero-hours workers like the arrangement. In fact, most BME workers on variable-hours contracts would prefer to work fixed hours.

We need swift action from the government to ban the use of such contracts. It should give workers the right to contracts reflecting their normal hours of work and implement long-awaited plans to introduce ethnic minority pay gap reporting.

Introduction

A zero-hours contract is one in which an employer is not obliged to provide a minimum number of hours.

New analysis contained in this report reveals that:

  • nearly 160,000 BME workers are on zero-hours contracts, around one in six of the 1 million people who are on them, even though BME workers make up just one in nine employees
  • one in 20 (4.5 per cent) women workers from a BME background are on such contracts, compared to just 2.5 per cent of white men
  • more than half of BME workers on a variable-hours contract would like a fixed-hours contract. Just 27 per cent would prefer their existing arrangement.

Zero-hours contracts are the most egregious form of one-sided flexibility.

Those with no guaranteed hours are often offered work at the whim of their employer, can face irregular shifts and therefore irregular income. Rather than pick and choose their hours, many workers feel compelled to work whenever asked. If shifts are turned down, there’s an implicit threat that they could lose future work.

We urgently need a package to deliver decent jobs for BME workers including:

  • a ban on zero-hours contracts
  • the introduction of ethnic minority pay gap reporting
  • new corporate reporting obligations on firms’ employment models.

Part of a longer press release at https://www.tuc.org.uk/research-analysis/reports/bme-workers-zero-hours-contracts

June 21, 2021

New data shows ministers knew early years was underfunded – Early Year Alliance

Data obtained by the Alliance via Freedom of Information (FOI) requests shows that the funding rates paid to local authorities for the so-called ‘free childcare’ offer are just two-thirds of what the government itself estimated would be needed to fully fund the scheme.

Following a two-year FOI battle with the Department for Education, the data reveals that civil servants estimated that a government-funded early years place for three- and four-year-olds would cost an average of £7.49 per hour by 2020/21.

By contrast, the average rate paid to local authorities for this offer is currently just £4.89, according to independent analysts Ceeda.

That’s a shortfall of £2.60 per child, per hour for every 30-hours place – or £2,964 a over the course of a year.

The documents state that the government expects providers to “move, over time, to full use of statutory staff ratios” to accomodate the shortfall. This is despite low child-adult ratios being associated with higher quality early years provision.

Rising costs for parents

The documents obtained also reveal that ministers were aware that the inadequate levels of investment proposed would result in higher prices for parents of younger children as providers would be forced to cross-subsidise those on the 30-hours scheme.

The Early Years Spending Review Scenarios document, obtained by the Alliance, also exposes a deliberate strategy of passing-on costs to parents. It states: “We will strip out funding for consumables (food, nappies) – and set an expectation that providers charge parents for these.”

This acceptance of inevitable price increases for families comes despite the fact that the document goes on to state that “a 10% reduction in the cost of childcare might lead to a 1.4% increase in the employment rate for married mothers with pre-school age children”.

Accepting cost increases

A separate briefing note to then-early years minister Sam Gyimah, obtained as part of the FOI request and marked as ‘RE: Early Years Funding Rate Negotiations”, which has been heavily redacted, states that the total annual cost for increasing early years funding rates could be:

“… reduced to c. £500m if ministers are content that we do not fund providers to cross-subside the privately-paid rate for children younger than three, and instead accept that prices will rise for these children”.

Following the 2015 Spending Review, government ultimately implemented an annual increase in funding of just £300m per year, which came into effect in 2017.

To read the full press release and background papers go to https://www.eyalliance.org.uk/news/2021/06/new-data-shows-ministers-knew-early-years-was-underfunded

June 21, 2021

Majority of nursing staff have experienced sexual harassment at work – Unison survey

Three in five nurses (60%) have experienced sexual harassment at work, according to a survey published by UNISON and Nursing Times.

More than 2,000 nursing staff and students took part in the research, which shows that ​incidents ​of sexual harassment are almost commonplace, with staff targeted by patients, family and friends of those in their care, and their own health colleagues.

Some said they were expected to put up with abusive behaviour because it ​was seen as “just part of the job”, while a number described it happening so frequently that it ha​d become “normal”.

For many, these were far from one-off incidents. As many as one in nine (11%) said they often encountered such experiences and a fifth (21%) reported occasional harassment.

Of those who had been harassed, only around a quarter (27%) had reported it to their employer. ​Others said they didn’t believe the issue ​was taken seriously and a third (35%) said not enough was being done to protect them from incidents in the workplace.

The most common harassment was verbal and encountered by more than half (56%) of all who took part in the survey, including comments about appearance, questions about private lives or inappropriate jokes.

More than a third (37%) had experienced physical incidents, including being groped by patients during procedures and having their bodies touched by colleagues.

Almost three in five (58%) of those who had been harassed said it was by a patient, a quarter (26%) by medical colleagues, a similar proportion (24%) by other nursing colleagues and almost one in five (19%) had been harassed by family and friends of patients.

One community nurse who took part in the survey said: “Sexual harassment needs to be viewed as a more serious offence than it currently is. The response I got from my manager and colleagues was, ‘well, that’s just part of the job’. It isn’t. It’s offensive and abusive and makes you feel scared to go to work.”

Incidents occurred regardless of gender with three fifths (62%) of female respondents encountering harassment and half (51%) of male nursing staff.

Some who gave their views in the survey said there continued to be a damaging sexualised image of nurses from old movies and the media. One said: “The public think nurses are fair game, with comments about uniforms. This makes it hard to address, as these are our patients and visitors. But trusts need to do more and we need to change the public’s perception from the Carry On film image of nursing.”

Part of a longer press release at https://www.unison.org.uk/news/2021/06/majority-of-nursing-staff-have-experienced-sexual-harassment-at-work-survey-shows/

 

June 21, 2021

Women held to higher standards across financial services – new report from the LSE for WIBF

Women in financial services in the City of London struggle if they do not perform consistently well, while mediocre men are surviving the industry in high numbers.

This is according to a new report from LSE and Women in Banking and Finance (WIBF).

Researchers found a number of reasons for this disparity, include social norms, retention bias and a difficulty among women, especially black women, to gain recognition on their performance at work. Furthermore, the report identified a tendency for managers to fake empathy when managing women, recognising that the trait was now seen as valuable.

According to the study, women in financial services are in a sink-or-swim position, while men have many more opportunities to survive. This strongly indicates women are being held to higher standards; they are either ridiculed or celebrated, and have less leeway to make mistakes than men. In addition, seemingly below-average men often survive because they play ‘good politics’ and bring this ethos into their management, acting as gatekeepers of opportunities for emerging talent. This translates to emerging women being less likely to receive opportunities under these leaders, and often seeing their progression blocked.

To tackle this challenge, WIBF and LSE have created the GOOD FINANCE framework to help bring inclusivity to financial services firms. The framework takes into account qualitative research involving 79 women who participated in a recent study and attended roundtables, alongside the 1,703 respondents who responded to a survey conducted by The Wisdom Council.

Read the full report: The Good Finance Framework

The study forms part of Accelerating Change Together (“ACT”) research programme designed and led by WIBF https://www.wibf.org.uk/ in partnership with The Inclusion Initiative at LSE and The Wisdom Council.  Contact operations@wibf.org.uk for more information.

Part of a longer press release at https://www.lse.ac.uk/News/Latest-news-from-LSE/2021/f-June-21/Women-held-to-higher-standards-across-financial-services

 

June 21, 2021