News & Campaigns
Trustees (Women in Prison)
University of Sussex publishes independent report into domestic violence case
Vice-Chancellor apologises to former student and says report recommendations will be implemented
The University of Sussex on 17 January 2017 published a report on the findings of the independent review into the institution’s handling of a recent domestic violence case. The case involved a former Sussex student, Allison Smith, and a former member of staff, Lee Salter.
Conducted by Durham University’s Professor Nicole Westmarland, the review was commissioned by the University of Sussex’s new Vice-Chancellor Professor Adam Tickell on his first day in the post on 1 September 2016. The purpose of the review was to identify poor and good practice in the University’s handling of the case, and to make recommendations to improve future policy and practice.
The report has concluded there were three areas of good practice in relation to two members of staff. These were:
- A senior member of staff provided weekly emotional support, from the time of the disclosure until the trial, to Ms Smith. The support is on-going and is described in the report as ‘subtle, unassuming and discreet’; with the member of staff demonstrating a ‘good understanding of the dynamics of domestic violence’.
- The same (above) member of staff proactively sought external advice in relation to risk.
- Another member of staff is praised for speaking out on behalf of other female members of staff.
The report identified four broad areas of poor practice:
- The University failed to follow and/or operationalise its own policies and procedures.
- There was an inadequate risk assessment.
- There was an over-reliance on and lack of scrutiny of Human Resources (HR) decision making.
- The University failed to communicate with Ms Smith and external organisations in a professional manner. The report also found the University failed in its duty of pastoral care towards Ms Smith.
Since the commissioning of the review, the University has begun to implement a number of initiatives to address the issues that this case has highlighted. In addition, Sussex will be implementing all of the report’s recommendations.
-
Recommendation 1: The Vice-Chancellor has apologised to Ms Smith in person. He believes it is only right the University acknowledges its failings in the handling of this case and publicly states its apology.
Recommendation 2: The University will update its disciplinary procedures and make clear the timing of actions in the event of on-going criminal justice proceedings.
Recommendation 3: The University will restate its condemnation of violence through its Prevention and Management of Violence Policy and update this in line with the recommendations in the report. Sussex is in the process of setting up a University-wide working group made up of the appropriate representatives in Equality and Diversity, Student Services, Human Resources, academic and professional services leaders, staff who specialise in related research, as well as expert organisations to undertake this work. The University will take steps to ensure the policy works on an ‘every day’ basis and is embedded into institutional practices. It is important to acknowledge the key relationships the University has with expert and specialist organisations such as domestic abuse charity RISE, the Survivors’ Network, Mankind and Rape Crisis. The University will also continue to work with Brighton & Hove City Council’s ‘Violence against Women and Girls’ initiative.
Recommendation 4: The University will call upon its extensive internal expertise and resources, as well as specialist external advice, to develop a clear policy on staff-student and staff-staff relationships. Work has begun to understand the important considerations, which need to be taken into account when developing and implementing such a policy.
Recommendation 5: The University will ensure it embeds a new, robust and transparent risk assessment process, which includes representation from the person making the complaint.
Recommendation 6: The University has established a new ‘case conference’ process, which ensures that HR decision-making is open to discussion and challenge; and that there is greater representation of views from senior managers in cases where there are allegations of gross misconduct. The University publicly recognises the critical role of the Vice-Chancellor and Registrar in ensuring the well-being and safety of its students and staff.
Recommendation 7: In October 2016, the University announced the appointment of two senior academic staff as joint Deputy Pro-Vice Chancellor of Equality and Diversity – a newly created position. This role will be supported by additional staff to establish a team dedicated to addressing the institution’s objectives and will include a single point of contact for all complaints of violence, abuse or harassment.
Recommendation 8: The University has started work to ensure information on this subject is easily accessible on its website. It is also developing other digital tools to allow students to report complaints.
Recommendation 9: The University is continuing to roll out training for frontline staff to help them provide the best possible support in relation to disclosure of information and complaints. It is also in the process of identifying comprehensive awareness and behaviour changing training initiatives; and ensuring that all leaders in the organisation participate in these. In addition, the University will develop a ‘Care Pathway’ (the process for identifying and following abuse complaints) which will be incorporated into the institution’s staff induction programme.
Recommendation 10: The University is committed to looking into any matter that is raised in relation to violence, abuse or harassment. The Vice-Chancellor has given his personal assurance that anyone who comes forward will be offered a meeting with a senior manager of the University.
Recommendation 11: The University will be undertaking a number of initiatives, which focus on creating an on-going campus wide conversation about violence, abuse and harassment. Following on from the recent ‘Sexual Consent’ information campaign, the University will carry on this work with the Students’ Union and Safer Sussex group. Sussex has also commissioned a major initiative – Changing University Cultures (www.chucl.com) – which will focus on working with staff to acknowledge issues, create understanding and bring about cultural change. Dr Alison Phipps and Dr Liz McDonnell, experts in gender and higher education at Sussex, will deliver this initiative, alongside Jess Taylor, an independent organisational development consultant.
Download report from https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=westmarland-review.pdf&site=303
Part of a longer press release at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/newsandevents/pressrelease/id/38671
Parents short-changing girls on pocket money – Childwise survey
Boys receive £2.20 more pocket money a week than girls, a survey has found, suggesting the gender pay gap starts early and in the home.
Boys aged five to 16 get on average £10.70 a week made up from pocket money, a paid job or paid chores. Girls are on £8.50 a week, data suggests.
The survey of 2,000 UK children by researchers Childwise also found boys were given more financial independence.
Parents were teaching girls and boys differently about money, it found.
The majority of children receive some sort of regular weekly payment, typically pocket money from their parents, data suggested. Only one in five had a paid job.
‘Early gender imbalance’
Researchers found that the difference between girls and boys’ allowance becomes wider the older they get.
Boys aged 11 to 16 were on £17.80, while girls of the same age were on £12.50, a gap of £5.30.
Childwise research manager Jenny Ehren said: “The data points towards an early gender imbalance in the way parents educate their children about money matters and financial independence.
“Boys are more likely to be entrusted with regular cash payments, while girls are more reliant on other people buying them items, or managing money on their behalf.”
She added that girls appeared to have less financial freedom than boys.
“They are more likely to have things bought for them, including expensive items such as clothes and footwear, and lower cost purchases such as toiletries, hair products and makeup,” said Ms Ehren.
These extra purchases helped to bridge the income gap between boys and girls, but the approach to managing money matters was “noticeably different”, she added.
The most popular pocket money purchase was sweets and chocolate, followed closely by crisps, snacks, soft drinks and going out, the survey found.
It also showed:
- Girls were more likely than boys to receive no regular income at all
- 5% of 13-16 year olds have a part-time job
- Five to 10-year-olds receive on average £7.30 a week from handouts, pocket money and paid work. Eleven to 16-year-olds receive £22.90 on average
- The total spending power of children in the UK is estimated at nearly £7,000 million a year
Fed up of shouting at the news?
Maybe you should be commentating on it instead.
HERitage stall this Saturday 29th January at St Cuthbert's hall, Amble. Come along, see you there